|
Home > Working Papers
Search |
View by Year |
View by Category |
View by Author |
View by JEL Code
by
Joseph Ritter, and Joseph G. Haubrich
Considering the dynamics of commitment highlights, some neglected features of time inconsistency problems. We modify the standard rules-versus-discretion question in three ways: (1) A government that does not commit today retains the option to do so tomorrow, (2) the government's commitment capability is restricted to a class of simple rules, and (3) the government's ability to make irrevocable commitments is restricted. Three results stand out. First, the option to wait makes the incumbent regime (rules or discretion) relatively more attractive. Second, the option to wait means that increased uncertainly makes the incumbent regime more attractive. Third, because the commitment decision takes place in 'real time,' policy choice displays hysteresis.
Full Text - Acrobat PDF (2M)
Notify Me of Updates for:
Category > Monetary Policy/Macroeconomics
Research Papers and Publications: JEL Code > E42
Research Papers and Publications: JEL Code > E58
Research Papers and Publications: JEL Code > E61
Research Papers and Publications: JEL Code > H10
|