Review
Information
- Copyrights and Permissions
- Information for Authors
Tools
Related Links
Home > Publications > Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review > May/June 2006
The 1990s Acceleration in Labor Productivity: Causes and Measurement
by Richard G. Anderson and Kevin L. Kliesen
in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, May/June 2006 Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 181-202
The acceleration of labor productivity growth that began during the mid-1990s is the defining economic event of the past decade. A consensus has arisen among economists that the acceleration was caused by technological innovations that decreased the quality-adjusted prices of semiconductors and related information-communications technology (ICT) products, including digital computers. In sharp contrast to the previous 20 years, services-producing sectors—heavy users of ICT products—led the productivity increase, besting even a robust manufacturing sector. In this article, the authors survey the performance of the services-producing and goods-producing sectors and examine revisions to aggregate labor productivity data of the type commonly discussed by policymakers. The revisions, at times, were large enough to reverse preliminary conclusions regarding productivity growth slowdowns and accelerations. The unanticipated acceleration in the services sector and the large size of revisions to aggregate data combine to shed light on why economists were slow to recognize the productivity acceleration.
Read Full Text
Data
Review articles reprinted from other sources may not be reprinted by third parties without permission from the original publisher.
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis holds copyrights for all other content published in the Review and grants permission free of charge to reprint these articles. No written permission is necessary if articles are reprinted in full and without modification.
Abstracts, synopses, excerpts, and other derivative works may be made only with prior written permission of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and must include full citation, copyright notice, and disclaimer.
Sample:
This abstract is reprinted here with permission from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Yi Wen and Huabin Wu, "Dynamics of Externalities: A Second-Order Perspective," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, May/June 2011, 93(3), pp. 187-205.
© 2011 by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. All views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or the Federal Reserve System.
For permission, contact George Fortier, Managing Editor, Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, MO 63166-0442; 314-444-7320; george.e.fortier@stls.frb.org.
The Review is a bimonthly economics journal published by the Research Division of the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis. It has been published in its current form continuously since the 1960s
and is free of charge. The issues are printed and mailed to approximately 16,000 subscribers, and
our website contains the latest issue and a searchable archive of past issues.
The Review offers a wide range of content: Some articles are accessible enough for the
undergraduate, whereas others are highly technical analyses aimed at the PhD economist.
Submissions:
The content of the Review is produced primarily by economists at the Federal Reserve Bank
of St. Louis. However, submissions are also open to all economists affiliated with the Federal
Reserve System, which includes the 12 regional Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors.
All manuscripts submitted to the Review go through our standard peer-review process—that is,
they are read and critiqued by two referees and the editor-in-chief. Accepted papers are then
copyedited and processed for publication. Authors approve or amend all substantive edits and
have the opportunity to review page proofs before publication.
It is expected that all authors published in the Review will serve as referee for two submitted
papers.
One of the benefits of the Review is its quick publication schedule. Delays between acceptance
and publication are rare. Papers accepted in January, for example, could easily be published
in the May/June issue, which is posted online on May 1. In turn, authors are expected to be as
timely as possible in response to copyeditor queries and page proof review.
Guidelines:
We prefer to receive MS Word files, but we can translate papers submitted in Scientific
Workplace, LaTeX, etc. and then thoroughly cross-check them to ensure the accuracy of the text
and equations.
We prefer to receive figures submitted as Excel or postscript files, but almost any original figure
file can be accommodated. (Figures embedded in Word, PDF files, or PowerPoint slides seldom
work well.)
There are no restrictions on the length of submitted papers; we leave that to the author’s good
judgment. There are also no restrictions on the topic, and the usual disclaimers apply: “The
views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the
views of the Federal Reserve System, the Board of Governors, or the regional Federal Reserve
Banks...”
Work submitted to the Review may not be simultaneously submitted to other publications. Work
published in the Review may be reprinted with the proper citation and copyright notice.
For questions, please contact George Fortier, Managing Editor, Research Division, Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis, P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, MO 63166-0442; 314-444-7320;
george.e.fortier@stls.frb.org.
